Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:04
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
4 foods that can lower blood pressure naturally, according to a top cardiologist - Times of India
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Democrats be honest, how many of you were wishing that Musk rescue space flight blew up?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
PSA: You Probably Don't Need To Be Weighed At The Doctor's Office - HuffPost
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Nintendo Switch 2’s faster chip can dramatically improve original Switch games - Ars Technica
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
7 Late-Night Snacks to Support Your Metabolism, According to Experts - AOL.com